Member checking is a core credibility strategy in qualitative research, used to validate that a researcher's interpretations align with participants' intended meanings. By returning summaries, themes, or key findings to the people who provided them, researchers can identify misinterpretations, fill gaps, and refine conclusions before reporting. The practice is closely associated with Lincoln and Guba's framework for establishing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry, alongside transferability, dependability, and confirmability. In enterprise research contexts, member checking strengthens stakeholder confidence in findings by demonstrating that insights are grounded in real participant voices rather than researcher assumptions or analytical shortcuts.