Why waves are different from re-running a study
You could imagine getting the same effect by duplicating a study every month and analyzing each copy. Waves are better in two ways:- Nothing to re-launch. Interviews keep flowing into the live program; Conveo cuts them into waves and analyzes each one automatically.
- Findings are connected across waves. Conveo recognizes when this wave’s finding is the same story as a previous wave’s and links them, so you can see how it emerged and changed. A pile of separate monthly studies can’t tell you that. (See Insights for how threading works.)
The lifecycle of a wave
Each wave moves through three phases:
Once a wave closes, its results are fixed — it’s a permanent record of what the
data said during that window. New interviews count toward the next wave, not a
past one, so history never shifts under you.
Recruitment vs. reporting
A Storyline has two independent rhythms:- Recruitment — how participants arrive. This can be continuous (a steady stream all the time) or batched on a cadence (a fresh group each period).
- Reporting — how often Conveo analyzes and publishes. This is the wave cadence, and it’s what the timeline is built around.
Choosing a cadence
Pick a reporting cadence that matches how fast your topic actually moves and how many interviews you gather:- Weekly / biweekly — fast-moving topics with steady interview volume, where you want to catch shifts quickly.
- Monthly — the common default: enough interviews per wave for confident findings, frequent enough to stay current.
- Quarterly — slower-moving or lower-volume programs, or when you only need a periodic strategic read.
